As promised, this is my comparison post. A lot of the tasting and aromatic notes are the same, so I won’t act as if this is a whole new beer. Interesting observation, there was a surprising amount of carbonation but it was really slow-moving which was strange. I don’t know what that means, but it just looked cool. In case you are wondering, I am also distracted by shiny objects; I’m a guy what do you expect?
I got the booze straight away in both the aroma and the taste. The cherry notes are subdued and the sweetness in the 2010 was almost non-existent. I got some malty notes this time around. There was also an interesting tasting experience throughout each sip. At the start I got the malty taste, it got dry in the middle, and an easy finish. It did’t taste as boozy as I thought, but still boozier than I would like. The booze felt like it was compacted in the beer; something just wasn’t right. Like guys who wear skinny jeans, a bit unbearable.
Verdict: Spill It! Don’t misunderstand the verdict, I like the beer, just not right now. If you have a 2011 Olde School, I recommend aging it. I prefer the aged 2010 over the 2011. The time softens the alcohol and allows the beer to grow-up a bit. I could appreciate the nuances of the beer and actual taste the beer instead of just the alcohol. I’m glad I had the two beers to compare because it made me appreciate how different the same beer can be after just a year. I have to get another 2011 and open it next year. Who’s with me?
[…] he’s reviewing, or he doesn’t. Check out whether he filled or spilled DFH beers Fort, Old School 2011, Old School 2010, Punkin’ Ale, Pangaea, and finally his thoughts on his visit to the source […]